Well, this was the longest seminar I attended for this course till now. For the first half of the seminar, we mainly concentrated upon
"The Collective Intelligence or the Crowd Wisdom (or Madness)". We discussed how some thought that the decision made by a crowd or a large number of participants diminishes the quality of the discussion and the decision made while some believed that a group of people in the right circumstances make decisions which are better than what the smartest person from the group could have thought of individually. The professor gave us the example of a U.S. submarine,
Scorpion which disappeared in 1968. He told us how the investigative team, using their collective intelligence and expertise, had estimated the location correctly to couple of hundred yards!
We went on to discuss some of the problems faced by a crowd and how the participants perform to them. It was pointed out by the professor that according to a research done in the working of the crowd participation in the greatly popular show "
Who wants to be a Millionaire", the audience could answer the question correctly 91% of the time! That is an amazing percentage considering the audience is not a panels of experts that specialized in the fields. The crowd from the TV show is the perfect example to show how they tackled cognition problems i.e. problems with definitive solutions.
I will always remember how the crowd tackles coordination problems. The professor gave an excellent example, describing how people "swim" their way through traffic in Bangkok. But neither will I forget the example for problems faced related to cooperation among people to get work done in the public work sector. The auto-rickshaw emitting a huge cloud of smoke on the road reminded me that it was the cooperation of the people together that helped the laws and policies materialize.
I understood what a major factor diversity was in enhancing the collective intelligence of the crowd after I found out about the excellent job the crowd does on the TV show I talked about earlier. It also reminded me of this case one of our core subject lecturer mentioned one
day. He told us about a senior who had gone for his IA (Industrial Attachment) in a big company. Although he was just employed as a intern and not a regular staff, he managed to solve a significant problem that the company was facing using only the basic knowledge he had about the related field. The company, as a result, gave the student an excellent feedback for his work and awarded him for his work after his attachment was over. This example came to my mind when diversity and independence were being discussed in class. It was clear that even though he was not an expert in the field he could solve the problem the in-house experts at the company had overlooked or given up on just by thinking independently. The company by asking him to join as an intern in the company had diversified their employee base and it paid off for them.
I also remembered this news article I had read on a news site even before I had taken up this course. It was about an increase in the prices of
Sony Corp. shares after
Goldman Sachs, one of the largest investment banks in the world, changing the rating of the company in its listings. These are the listings many of the world largest banks and financial securities companies subscribe to and follow. Fortunately, I found the link to the news article. Click on the link to read the full article (Source:
January 8,2007 -CNN.com-) Bless the news archives! I wondered at that time why so many blindly followed its ratings. Everybody can make mistakes even large investment banks! Even they fire their investment bankers now and then. I would say this piece of news clearly represents the
cascading effect the professor was talking about in class. The small investors follow the big ones in the surge and end up losing a lot of money.
"Because this is a Goldman upgrade, everyone is paying attention," says Ken Masuda, a senior dealer in equities in a leading Japanese company providing financial services.
We also went on to discuss how this collective wisdom affects the results on Google search. After Professor Gilbert explained to us how the "
spider" searches and assigns tags to web pages and we get more relevant results. Here is a chart that explains the process:
Source:
HowStuffWorks.com (Click on the link for more info)
One of the slides, shown posed the question,
"How is Web 1.0 and 2.0 different?"To explain this, the professor gave us a simple example. He compared Web 1.0 to a paper encyclopedia that people used to own (maybe still do) which not only became outdated after some time, maybe even by the time one bought it, but only gave a one perspective of the events. On the other hand, sites like
Wikipedia use the Web 2.0 concept and helps provide readers with different viewpoints on the same issue thereby presenting a more neutral stand all issues.
During this seminar I also got to revise some of the concept from my marketing module. We discussed how a company can more efficiently and accurately conduct its market research and set an approximate production target and also control pricing using online simulated communities like the widely popular
Second Life. I had once stumbled upon this "game" a while back and read up its description but never really thought how companies could have been using the players in this game to solve their problems in the real world!
The professor also mentioned
Apple's iPhone and how a service provider can increase its market share by introducing the product in Singapore. Interesting enough, I had just read something related a day before the seminar. One of the Canadian companies, Rogers Wireless is going to provide the iPhone to its users exclusively in the country. (Source:
Gizmodo) So will one of our own try something similar, time will tell... or the web anyway!
We had also started to discuss about Mobile Commerce just before the end of the seminar. We briefly discussed ideas which can help make it more convenient for people to buy movie tickets, pay for parking using cellphones and the mobile networks already in place. The assignment for this week is somewhat related to this topic and I hope I can do well in it.